...and no, I don't think that even if I try "real hard," I'll get what I need. Well, not unless you count logging in to the WorldCat feature of our OCLC database whilst at work (the which is very cool, granted).
What I wanted (needed?) is an ability to search local library catalogs "all 'twonc't" as the saying goes. Sno-Isle + KCLS + Seattle Public (for all of which I have library cards) = Totally Cool.
Or would, if I could, using this week's tool: Google Search.
No joy.
The thing of it is, as a librarian, the sites I usually "search" aren't sites: they're the databases hosted by said sites. Mostly, that is [cue Newt voice]. Mostly.
Because I did build a one-stop booktalk-shopper for when I need to build-a-booktalk. These days, I mostly write the things in between customers on the circ/reference desk: Short-cuts are definitely a plus.
And did it work? Yes: just as well as searching each of the book-talking sites individually. But (and it's a big "but"), not appreciably better than just using the main Google search page. For why? Because both the Google "Custom" Search and the Google main page grouped the "best answers" at the top.
Does that mean I found it useless? No. It might still come in handy at some point, some day. But for now, the "custom search" tool won't get pride-of-place in my "Library 2.0" toolbox.
No comments:
Post a Comment